<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blog Rush: Post on your Non-SEO blogs!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://money.bigbucksblogger.com/blog-rush-post-on-your-non-seo-blogs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://money.bigbucksblogger.com/blog-rush-post-on-your-non-seo-blogs/</link>
	<description>Comments on blogs about making money blogging.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:11:10 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Webmaster</title>
		<link>http://money.bigbucksblogger.com/blog-rush-post-on-your-non-seo-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-2288</link>
		<dc:creator>Webmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 13:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://money.bigbucksblogger.com/blog-rush-post-on-your-non-seo-blogs/#comment-2288</guid>
		<description>Hummm....
I think very interesting to talk about because we people generally ignore these small things. I would like to appreciate your effort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hummm&#8230;.<br />
I think very interesting to talk about because we people generally ignore these small things. I would like to appreciate your effort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maurice (TheCaymanHost)</title>
		<link>http://money.bigbucksblogger.com/blog-rush-post-on-your-non-seo-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-2197</link>
		<dc:creator>Maurice (TheCaymanHost)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 22:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://money.bigbucksblogger.com/blog-rush-post-on-your-non-seo-blogs/#comment-2197</guid>
		<description>Hi Lucia

You need to get rid of the widget on your post as according to the blog at BlogRush they are intending to delete any members showing more than one widget per blog.

They are asking bloggers to use a static screenshot   for posts promoting the program.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Lucia</p>
<p>You need to get rid of the widget on your post as according to the blog at BlogRush they are intending to delete any members showing more than one widget per blog.</p>
<p>They are asking bloggers to use a static screenshot   for posts promoting the program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucia</title>
		<link>http://money.bigbucksblogger.com/blog-rush-post-on-your-non-seo-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-2185</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://money.bigbucksblogger.com/blog-rush-post-on-your-non-seo-blogs/#comment-2185</guid>
		<description>I mentioned it on  my knitting blog. I think it&#039;s a darn ugly widget and I saw the bit about the stats page. But since I just put it up, I can&#039;t report how it&#039;s working!

I put this in the &quot;kinda good idea&quot; with an &quot;OK nterface&quot; but with a great marketing idea at launch. (I think it&#039;s also the sort of thing that can only succeed with a great marketing launch. We&#039;ll see how it works.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I mentioned it on  my knitting blog. I think it&#8217;s a darn ugly widget and I saw the bit about the stats page. But since I just put it up, I can&#8217;t report how it&#8217;s working!</p>
<p>I put this in the &#8220;kinda good idea&#8221; with an &#8220;OK nterface&#8221; but with a great marketing idea at launch. (I think it&#8217;s also the sort of thing that can only succeed with a great marketing launch. We&#8217;ll see how it works.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TDavid</title>
		<link>http://money.bigbucksblogger.com/blog-rush-post-on-your-non-seo-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-2183</link>
		<dc:creator>TDavid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 15:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://money.bigbucksblogger.com/blog-rush-post-on-your-non-seo-blogs/#comment-2183</guid>
		<description>Anybody actually see dashboard stats yet? Seems strange that the stats don&#039;t start appearing right away. A lot of people (myself included) are putting some faith into this one working as advertised.

Dashboard stats message in Blogrush currently says: &quot;We encountered some minor issues with the batch processing of our first cycle of member statistics (it&#039;s a lot of data to crunch) and we just about have it fixed. We hope to have your statistics up and running very soon as we know they are very important to you. We just need a little bit more time.&quot;

We put it on our group blog, but are holding off using it elsewhere until we see if we aren&#039;t just sending readers into a non-returning black hole.

With that said, traffic was up a little bit over the weekend averages, so that&#039;s a positive sign.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anybody actually see dashboard stats yet? Seems strange that the stats don&#8217;t start appearing right away. A lot of people (myself included) are putting some faith into this one working as advertised.</p>
<p>Dashboard stats message in Blogrush currently says: &#8220;We encountered some minor issues with the batch processing of our first cycle of member statistics (it&#8217;s a lot of data to crunch) and we just about have it fixed. We hope to have your statistics up and running very soon as we know they are very important to you. We just need a little bit more time.&#8221;</p>
<p>We put it on our group blog, but are holding off using it elsewhere until we see if we aren&#8217;t just sending readers into a non-returning black hole.</p>
<p>With that said, traffic was up a little bit over the weekend averages, so that&#8217;s a positive sign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.597 seconds -->
