<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BlogRush Is Doomed!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://money.bigbucksblogger.com/blogrush-is-doomed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://money.bigbucksblogger.com/blogrush-is-doomed/</link>
	<description>Comments on blogs about making money blogging.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 16:31:57 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lucia</title>
		<link>http://money.bigbucksblogger.com/blogrush-is-doomed/comment-page-1/#comment-2432</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 17:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://money.bigbucksblogger.com/blogrush-is-doomed/#comment-2432</guid>
		<description>@Matt-- Yep. I think the widgets have to be associated with something &quot;extra&quot;. 

I&#039;m keeping it up for a little while to accumulate statistics. Unlike other widgets that are associated with &#039;communities&#039; (like Bumpzee), blogrush doesn&#039;t have this &quot;extra&quot;.

So, Blogrush has very good with its targeting for this to work. They also need to overcome the cheaters. If they don&#039;t the widgets will vanish from peoples blogs.

Will Blogrush manage?  I&#039;m &lt;i&gt;not&lt;/i&gt; optimistic. Andy Beard seems more optimistic. We&#039;ll see!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Matt&#8211; Yep. I think the widgets have to be associated with something &#8220;extra&#8221;. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m keeping it up for a little while to accumulate statistics. Unlike other widgets that are associated with &#8216;communities&#8217; (like Bumpzee), blogrush doesn&#8217;t have this &#8220;extra&#8221;.</p>
<p>So, Blogrush has very good with its targeting for this to work. They also need to overcome the cheaters. If they don&#8217;t the widgets will vanish from peoples blogs.</p>
<p>Will Blogrush manage?  I&#8217;m <i>not</i> optimistic. Andy Beard seems more optimistic. We&#8217;ll see!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lord Matt</title>
		<link>http://money.bigbucksblogger.com/blogrush-is-doomed/comment-page-1/#comment-2430</link>
		<dc:creator>Lord Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 16:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://money.bigbucksblogger.com/blogrush-is-doomed/#comment-2430</guid>
		<description>In the &quot;pre-blog&quot; days these widget-esk exchanges did not work.  I doubt much has changed.  Each user can put the widget &quot;out of the way&quot; and earn the impressions without much chance of sending visitors.  To all ends it is a banner exchange with  links.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the &#8220;pre-blog&#8221; days these widget-esk exchanges did not work.  I doubt much has changed.  Each user can put the widget &#8220;out of the way&#8221; and earn the impressions without much chance of sending visitors.  To all ends it is a banner exchange with  links.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucia</title>
		<link>http://money.bigbucksblogger.com/blogrush-is-doomed/comment-page-1/#comment-2323</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 12:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://money.bigbucksblogger.com/blogrush-is-doomed/#comment-2323</guid>
		<description>@Mikael-- Thanks for the feed back.  I&#039;m going to be watching the stats. 

Maybe the low CTR was due to installing just as the hackers were posting PHP codes to let people load pages over and over and over? We&#039;ll see!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mikael&#8211; Thanks for the feed back.  I&#8217;m going to be watching the stats. </p>
<p>Maybe the low CTR was due to installing just as the hackers were posting PHP codes to let people load pages over and over and over? We&#8217;ll see!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikael Pittam</title>
		<link>http://money.bigbucksblogger.com/blogrush-is-doomed/comment-page-1/#comment-2321</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikael Pittam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 11:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://money.bigbucksblogger.com/blogrush-is-doomed/#comment-2321</guid>
		<description>If it&#039;s any consolation, I found (and bookmarked) your site via BlogRush. I hope it works out well for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it&#8217;s any consolation, I found (and bookmarked) your site via BlogRush. I hope it works out well for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucia</title>
		<link>http://money.bigbucksblogger.com/blogrush-is-doomed/comment-page-1/#comment-2302</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 19:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://money.bigbucksblogger.com/blogrush-is-doomed/#comment-2302</guid>
		<description>@James-- I don&#039;t think it&#039;s going to get us banned from Adsense. It&#039;s not an automated traffic visit service. Besides, right now, Adsense would have to ban everyone-- which would ruin their revenue stream.

@Slevi-- I think people ignore the widgets. Also, I suspect in the first few days, bloggers clicked on the widget when they installed it at their own blog. Then, they stop! :)

@Maurice-- We are definitely saturated on Blogrush posts. At the same time, I&#039;m fascinated to read how much traffic each blogger got.  

I&#039;m also suspecting another reason my click through rate is low is I&#039;m in the third tier of joining-- and I put the widgets up &lt;i&gt;just as&lt;/i&gt; the guys posting the codes to auto-load the widgets started telling everyone how to do that.  So, my url may have appeared on auto-loaded widgets  no one ever even looked at.  

I don&#039;t care how great your title or topic is-- if it&#039;s auto loaded, no one is going to click!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@James&#8211; I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s going to get us banned from Adsense. It&#8217;s not an automated traffic visit service. Besides, right now, Adsense would have to ban everyone&#8211; which would ruin their revenue stream.</p>
<p>@Slevi&#8211; I think people ignore the widgets. Also, I suspect in the first few days, bloggers clicked on the widget when they installed it at their own blog. Then, they stop! <img src='http://money.bigbucksblogger.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>@Maurice&#8211; We are definitely saturated on Blogrush posts. At the same time, I&#8217;m fascinated to read how much traffic each blogger got.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m also suspecting another reason my click through rate is low is I&#8217;m in the third tier of joining&#8211; and I put the widgets up <i>just as</i> the guys posting the codes to auto-load the widgets started telling everyone how to do that.  So, my url may have appeared on auto-loaded widgets  no one ever even looked at.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t care how great your title or topic is&#8211; if it&#8217;s auto loaded, no one is going to click!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maurice (ThaeCaymanHost)</title>
		<link>http://money.bigbucksblogger.com/blogrush-is-doomed/comment-page-1/#comment-2300</link>
		<dc:creator>Maurice (ThaeCaymanHost)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 19:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://money.bigbucksblogger.com/blogrush-is-doomed/#comment-2300</guid>
		<description>Ok, BlogRush coverage is getting too much but here&#039;s my feedback on the stats issue. Bear in  mind that I would have to be classed in the &quot;smaller&quot; blogs category. I installed the widget on  day one and have no referrals.

It&#039;s brought me 8 visitors so I guess that puts me in a better position than many are claiming. However, the visits have been cursory, an average stay just 13 seconds and 1.25 page views per visit and a bounce rate of 87.5%.

Does that make it worth the space I&#039;m giving the widget? Probably not but I&#039;m still going to let it stay for a little while longer, I&#039;ve never had any unrealistic hopes for its ability to drive traffic in any case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, BlogRush coverage is getting too much but here&#8217;s my feedback on the stats issue. Bear in  mind that I would have to be classed in the &#8220;smaller&#8221; blogs category. I installed the widget on  day one and have no referrals.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s brought me 8 visitors so I guess that puts me in a better position than many are claiming. However, the visits have been cursory, an average stay just 13 seconds and 1.25 page views per visit and a bounce rate of 87.5%.</p>
<p>Does that make it worth the space I&#8217;m giving the widget? Probably not but I&#8217;m still going to let it stay for a little while longer, I&#8217;ve never had any unrealistic hopes for its ability to drive traffic in any case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Pegram</title>
		<link>http://money.bigbucksblogger.com/blogrush-is-doomed/comment-page-1/#comment-2298</link>
		<dc:creator>James Pegram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 18:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://money.bigbucksblogger.com/blogrush-is-doomed/#comment-2298</guid>
		<description>In the end Blog Rush is just another glamourized directory listing. Probably get us all banned from Adsense to boot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the end Blog Rush is just another glamourized directory listing. Probably get us all banned from Adsense to boot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slevi</title>
		<link>http://money.bigbucksblogger.com/blogrush-is-doomed/comment-page-1/#comment-2296</link>
		<dc:creator>Slevi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 18:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://money.bigbucksblogger.com/blogrush-is-doomed/#comment-2296</guid>
		<description>Hehe, I was being cynical when I said your click rate was horrible, they&#039;re all trashy click through rates if you ask me. If it doesn&#039;t result in at least 1 out of a hundred people to click on average there&#039;s just something wrong with the service.

What actually would be nicer is if each click cost you a credit, not each impression. But of course then the backlog of earned credits would never, ever be worked done through ;).

I&#039;d say the main issue isn&#039;t that it wouldn&#039;t be in the same interest but many people just ignore widgets. Just like ads tend to be completely ignored widgets have been used so damn much already it&#039;s not going to work.

The only thing which would probably still work to some degree is if 5 words maximum within an entry would be linked to the other entries. Rather than picking the titles it just picks top keywords from the original entry, scans through your entry on what can be used and parses it as a link. Sort of like the amazon contextual link beta stuff and quite a bunch of other services use as well.

Since links within entries is a natural thing still, it might just work.

Downside though, just like all other things like banners, widgets, icons, etcetera having been completely wasted stuff like this might result in people getting tired of links within entries in general as well which stops normal links from getting a chance too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hehe, I was being cynical when I said your click rate was horrible, they&#8217;re all trashy click through rates if you ask me. If it doesn&#8217;t result in at least 1 out of a hundred people to click on average there&#8217;s just something wrong with the service.</p>
<p>What actually would be nicer is if each click cost you a credit, not each impression. But of course then the backlog of earned credits would never, ever be worked done through <img src='http://money.bigbucksblogger.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
<p>I&#8217;d say the main issue isn&#8217;t that it wouldn&#8217;t be in the same interest but many people just ignore widgets. Just like ads tend to be completely ignored widgets have been used so damn much already it&#8217;s not going to work.</p>
<p>The only thing which would probably still work to some degree is if 5 words maximum within an entry would be linked to the other entries. Rather than picking the titles it just picks top keywords from the original entry, scans through your entry on what can be used and parses it as a link. Sort of like the amazon contextual link beta stuff and quite a bunch of other services use as well.</p>
<p>Since links within entries is a natural thing still, it might just work.</p>
<p>Downside though, just like all other things like banners, widgets, icons, etcetera having been completely wasted stuff like this might result in people getting tired of links within entries in general as well which stops normal links from getting a chance too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucia</title>
		<link>http://money.bigbucksblogger.com/blogrush-is-doomed/comment-page-1/#comment-2291</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 14:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://money.bigbucksblogger.com/blogrush-is-doomed/#comment-2291</guid>
		<description>@Slevi -- I suspect the extremely low click through rate is due to the fact that most of my credits and displays are for the knitting blog which has much higher traffic than this blog. Blog rush has a &quot;hobby&quot; category. But &quot;hobby&quot; is pretty broad. Why would a wood worker click knitting? Or vice versa? 

Plus, my best articles are hardly the  most recent ones. Blog rush &lt;i&gt;needs&lt;/i&gt; to make it possible for bloggers to display their more attractive titles &lt;i&gt;without&lt;/i&gt; following the JohnChow method of cheating!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Slevi &#8212; I suspect the extremely low click through rate is due to the fact that most of my credits and displays are for the knitting blog which has much higher traffic than this blog. Blog rush has a &#8220;hobby&#8221; category. But &#8220;hobby&#8221; is pretty broad. Why would a wood worker click knitting? Or vice versa? </p>
<p>Plus, my best articles are hardly the  most recent ones. Blog rush <i>needs</i> to make it possible for bloggers to display their more attractive titles <i>without</i> following the JohnChow method of cheating!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slevi</title>
		<link>http://money.bigbucksblogger.com/blogrush-is-doomed/comment-page-1/#comment-2290</link>
		<dc:creator>Slevi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 14:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://money.bigbucksblogger.com/blogrush-is-doomed/#comment-2290</guid>
		<description>Oh my, 1 out of 3059, you&#039;re doing truly bad! I have seen much better results so far :O.

Let&#039;s see, let&#039;s make it a top out of worst results which I came across so far then.

1/3059
1/2500&#039;ish
1/1900&#039;ish
1/1200&#039;ish
1/250&#039;ish

The 1/250&#039;ish was the best I&#039;ve seen so far, but even then is it truly worth it? A click through rate of 1/250 is pathetic still, definitely not worth the time of even bothering with. Many of the smaller blogs would get what, 1 extra visitor every 1 or 2 days thanks to blogrush if they manage to get a click through rate that good?

It&#039;s a waste of time and the widget doesn&#039;t even look good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh my, 1 out of 3059, you&#8217;re doing truly bad! I have seen much better results so far :O.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s see, let&#8217;s make it a top out of worst results which I came across so far then.</p>
<p>1/3059<br />
1/2500&#8242;ish<br />
1/1900&#8242;ish<br />
1/1200&#8242;ish<br />
1/250&#8242;ish</p>
<p>The 1/250&#8242;ish was the best I&#8217;ve seen so far, but even then is it truly worth it? A click through rate of 1/250 is pathetic still, definitely not worth the time of even bothering with. Many of the smaller blogs would get what, 1 extra visitor every 1 or 2 days thanks to blogrush if they manage to get a click through rate that good?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a waste of time and the widget doesn&#8217;t even look good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.255 seconds -->
