<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lucia&#8217;s Linky Love: Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://money.bigbucksblogger.com/lucias-linky-love-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://money.bigbucksblogger.com/lucias-linky-love-update/</link>
	<description>Comments on blogs about making money blogging.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:28:25 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://money.bigbucksblogger.com/lucias-linky-love-update/comment-page-1/#comment-5714</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 20:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://money.bigbucksblogger.com/lucias-linky-love-update/#comment-5714</guid>
		<description>Hi are you still blogging? I love your plugin btw, is there a way for you to increase the &quot;Keep dofollow off one particular name?&quot; option? This would be great for multi-author blogs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi are you still blogging? I love your plugin btw, is there a way for you to increase the &#8220;Keep dofollow off one particular name?&#8221; option? This would be great for multi-author blogs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Crawler</title>
		<link>http://money.bigbucksblogger.com/lucias-linky-love-update/comment-page-1/#comment-5439</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Crawler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 19:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://money.bigbucksblogger.com/lucias-linky-love-update/#comment-5439</guid>
		<description>( this comment is for admin only)

first time comment on this site and already marked as spam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>( this comment is for admin only)</p>
<p>first time comment on this site and already marked as spam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Six Ways to Tell Your Readers Apart Through Comments &#124; The Reader Appreciation Project</title>
		<link>http://money.bigbucksblogger.com/lucias-linky-love-update/comment-page-1/#comment-3935</link>
		<dc:creator>Six Ways to Tell Your Readers Apart Through Comments &#124; The Reader Appreciation Project</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 09:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://money.bigbucksblogger.com/lucias-linky-love-update/#comment-3935</guid>
		<description>[...] above technique uses a modified version of Lucia&#8217;s Linky Love WordPress Plugin. The number of comments showing is a great way for other readers to see how prominent a particular [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] above technique uses a modified version of Lucia&#8217;s Linky Love WordPress Plugin. The number of comments showing is a great way for other readers to see how prominent a particular [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucia</title>
		<link>http://money.bigbucksblogger.com/lucias-linky-love-update/comment-page-1/#comment-325</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 01:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://money.bigbucksblogger.com/lucias-linky-love-update/#comment-325</guid>
		<description>Finding the number of comments that &quot;match&quot; a visitor involves a database call that goes through the entire comments database, looks for all the comments that &quot;match&quot; and counts.  I make that call to decide whether or  not to give dofollows. Once I have the number, I can just display it without making any more calls.

About databased calls: Linky Love did the &quot;counting&quot; database call &lt;i&gt;twice&lt;/i&gt; for each comment that displays in a post. First when creating the html surrounding &quot;the name&quot; (so Tricia in your case). Then again when creating the text. Worse, the database call was written in a way that &lt;i&gt;itself&lt;/i&gt; made an unnecessary database call to find out the email of the person who commented. (This value is stored by Wordpress once it fishes out the comment and it already has done so.)
So, Linky Love did 4 database calls per comment!  

I reorganized and stored some values. This lets LLL do the same logic making only 1 database call per comment &lt;i&gt;at most&lt;/i&gt;. (It actually makes fewer some times. When real conversations occur, some people comment more than once. In that case, LLL remembers them and skips the database call)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finding the number of comments that &#8220;match&#8221; a visitor involves a database call that goes through the entire comments database, looks for all the comments that &#8220;match&#8221; and counts.  I make that call to decide whether or  not to give dofollows. Once I have the number, I can just display it without making any more calls.</p>
<p>About databased calls: Linky Love did the &#8220;counting&#8221; database call <i>twice</i> for each comment that displays in a post. First when creating the html surrounding &#8220;the name&#8221; (so Tricia in your case). Then again when creating the text. Worse, the database call was written in a way that <i>itself</i> made an unnecessary database call to find out the email of the person who commented. (This value is stored by Wordpress once it fishes out the comment and it already has done so.)<br />
So, Linky Love did 4 database calls per comment!  </p>
<p>I reorganized and stored some values. This lets LLL do the same logic making only 1 database call per comment <i>at most</i>. (It actually makes fewer some times. When real conversations occur, some people comment more than once. In that case, LLL remembers them and skips the database call)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tricia</title>
		<link>http://money.bigbucksblogger.com/lucias-linky-love-update/comment-page-1/#comment-323</link>
		<dc:creator>Tricia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 01:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://money.bigbucksblogger.com/lucias-linky-love-update/#comment-323</guid>
		<description>Glad I could help with some question/suggestions and funny link names. :) I don&#039;t mind being your guinea pig  - especially since you&#039;ve been making plugins pretty much whenever I say &quot;this could be better&quot; or &quot;we need something like this&quot;. LOL 

Thanks for changing the # of comments option to 10. I know I could have always edited it. I&#039;m sure a lot of people will use a lower level and I might too, but it&#039;s nice to be able to put it higher if my spammers don&#039;t get the message. 

I think I also like the number of comments that match the visitor (is this a database call?), who knows it might give people more incentive to comment more often when perhaps they see that others have left more comments than they have. 

Good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad I could help with some question/suggestions and funny link names. <img src='http://money.bigbucksblogger.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  I don&#8217;t mind being your guinea pig  &#8211; especially since you&#8217;ve been making plugins pretty much whenever I say &#8220;this could be better&#8221; or &#8220;we need something like this&#8221;. LOL </p>
<p>Thanks for changing the # of comments option to 10. I know I could have always edited it. I&#8217;m sure a lot of people will use a lower level and I might too, but it&#8217;s nice to be able to put it higher if my spammers don&#8217;t get the message. </p>
<p>I think I also like the number of comments that match the visitor (is this a database call?), who knows it might give people more incentive to comment more often when perhaps they see that others have left more comments than they have. </p>
<p>Good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.469 seconds -->
